Something just clicked.
Jan. 30th, 2011 05:16 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For a long time, schools for deaf children, when the existed at all, were aimed at teaching the children lip reading and speech and expressly forbade sign language, because they thought that sign was a crutch that would prevent the children from giving 100% to learning to talk.* This was, of course, insane. Not only do you need to give a child a fully functioning language before a certain age for them to ever truly grasp language, but it's mean, and counterproductive. People learn faster when they can approach a problem multiple ways. The idea that you can make people learn something faster by ruining their other options is the sort of thing you'd come up with if you'd never really interacted with another human being. The Deaf community has rightly taken schools to task for this.
But I don't see any difference between that and objecting to cochlear implants because they take kids away from the Deaf community. They're trying to keep someone in in their tribe by killing their other option. Absolutes are dangerous, but I can't think of a time when it's okay to do that.
*Many or possibly all cochlear implant centers still advise against teaching the kids sign, for the same reason.
But I don't see any difference between that and objecting to cochlear implants because they take kids away from the Deaf community. They're trying to keep someone in in their tribe by killing their other option. Absolutes are dangerous, but I can't think of a time when it's okay to do that.
*Many or possibly all cochlear implant centers still advise against teaching the kids sign, for the same reason.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-31 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-31 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-31 10:33 pm (UTC)Whoo hoo, systemic and individual racism!
no subject
Date: 2011-01-31 10:39 pm (UTC)Given how many times I get asked that question about Nolan, I believe it.